Join Devbot auto reviews

Looking for other bloggers out there whom enjoy cars as much as I do. If you're willing to write blogs on this page with me. Please email me at (dee8817@yahoo.com) looking for other bloggers who are serious about doing this. I will be posting blogs on the weekend. Looking for others who can post maybe once or twice a week. Please email me at the email address listed above if you're interested.

Sincerely,

Devbot Auto Reviews

Happy Halloween from Devbot auto reviews

Mini Cooper S

Likes: Stylish, roomy for such a small car, handles very well, very quick and nimple around town, cute way to have fun and save tons of money on fuel.

Dislikes: No more supercharged engine option, can easily get expensive with all those cool options to choose from, ride can get a little choppy on rough surfaces.

Overall: A great car, with tons of value for the money. Just go light on the options, and you'll have a great priced Mini of your own.

Born a bad driver?

Are you a bad driver? Maybe you can blame it on your genes. In a small study, researchers found that people with a gene variation performed 20 percent worse on simulated driving tests and did as poorly a few days later. Almost one in three Americans have the variation, the team said. "These people make more errors from the get-go, and they forget more of what they learned after time away," said Dr. Steven Cramer, neurology associate professor at the University of California at Irvine and senior author of a study published recently in the journal Cerebral Cortex, in a statement. The study authors say the gene variation lowers available levels of a protein that boosts memory by helping brain cells talk to one another and work properly. Earlier research has suggested people with the variation engage smaller areas of the brain when they take on tasks. "We wanted to study motor behavior, something more complex than finger-tapping," said Stephanie McHughen, a graduate student and lead author of the study in a statement. "Driving seemed like a good choice because it has a learning curve, and it's something most people know how to do. "Twenty-nine people took a driving test on a simulator, including seven with the gene variation. They had to learn to "drive" on a track that included tough-to-navigate curves and turns. They came back four days later to retake the test.

Those with the variant did worse and failed to remember as much the second time around as the others. "Behavior derives from dozens and dozens of neurophysiologic events, so it's somewhat surprising this exercise bore fruit," Cramer said. But don't be alarmed if you think you have this gene variation -- it has it's good side. The researcher say the gene also slows mental decline for people with conditions such as Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease or multiple sclerosis. "It's as if nature is trying to determine the best approach," Cramer said. "If you want to learn a new skill or have had a stroke and need to regenerate brain cells, there's evidence that having the variant is not good. But if you've got a disease that affects cognitive function, there's evidence it can act in your favor. The variant brings a different balance between flexibility and stability."

The best and the worst

It is easy to assume that certain automakers build only reliable cars and others don’t, however, nearly every manufacturer have their share of winners and losers in our annual reliability survey. Each company and even brand product portfolio runs a spectrum of reliability performance, with its own best and worst examples. For some, the range can span from much better than average to much worse than average, whereas other may be centered around average. The key lesson from scanning the data within an automaker is not to make assumptions. For example, the best Toyota Motor Company model in our reliability survey is the Lexus SC—its predicted reliability score is the second highest out of over 300 vehicles, but the worst is the Lexus GS (AWD), which scores in the bottom 10 percent, and receives a much worse than average rating, and is not recommended in our testing. While it is true that Lexus models tend to be reliable and test well, this is not the case for all Lexus vehicles.

The greatest disparity comes from Volkswagen. The VW Golf (aka Rabbit) is one of the most reliable small cars you can buy, but the Volkswagen Touareg has the lowest predicted reliability score in our 2009 Annual Auto Survey.

In most cases, the best model for reliability is a recommended model and the worst is not. However, Honda’s top reliable vehicle in our survey, the Honda Insight, is not recommended due to low scores in our testing. The least reliable Honda vehicle is the Acura RL, but it has an average reliability score and is recommended. Honda is one of the more consistent manufacturers and has no model that scored below average in reliability. The two more reliable General Motors products are from two brands that are leaving the GM umbrella. The Saturn Aura (4-cyl.) is newly recommended this year and the Pontiac Vibe will be phased out in the coming months.

BMW

Best: BMW 328i (RWD)

Worst: BMW 535i (AWD)*

Chrysler

Best: Jeep Patriot

Worst: Chrysler Town & Country/Dodge Grand Caravan

Ford

Best: Ford Fusion/Mercury Milan (4-cyl.)

Worst: Ford F-250 (turbodiesel, 4WD)*

General Motors

Best: Chevrolet Malibu (V6)

Worst: Chevrolet Colorado/GMC Canyon (4WD)

Honda

Best: Honda Insight*

Worst: Acura RL

Hyundai/Kia

Best: Hyundai Tucson

Worst: Kia Sedona

Mazda

Best: Mazda3 sedan

Worst: Mazda CX-7

Mercedes-Benz

Best: Mercedes-Benz GLK*

Worst: Mercedes-Benz GL-Class (turbodiesel)*

Nissan

Best: Infiniti M35 (RWD)

Worst: Nissan Versa sedan*

Subaru

Best: Subaru Impreza Outback Sport

Worst: Subaru Impreza WRX*

Toyota

Best: Lexus SC*

Worst: Lexus GS (AWD)

Volkswagen

Best: Volkswagen Golf (Rabbit)

Worst: Volkswagen Touareg*

Volvo

Best: Volvo S40 (FWD)*

Worst: Volvo XC90 (V8)*

The main take away from this information is don’t judge a book by its cover. Avoid assumptions and do your research before you buy your next vehicle. It takes just a few minutes to browse the model overview pages, or use the interactive new car selector tool, which sorts and filters by the parameters that matter most to you. Either path will reveal Consumer Reports recommended models that did well in our road tests, score average or better in reliability, and performs at least adequately if included in government or insurance industry safety tests. For more details on our 2009 Annual Auto Survey including the full list of most and least reliable new cars by vehicle type, see our reliability report. Also, check out our guide to car reliability for more details on new and used car reliability as well as owner satisfaction.

Cash for clunkers debate

The Obama administration on Thursday lashed out at a prominent critic of its Cash for Clunkers program, arguing that the popular trade-in initiative helped give the auto industry and the economy a much needed boost in the past few months. In a blog post on whitehouse.gov, the administration argued that a report on Clunkers by automotive Web site Edmunds.com "doesn't withstand even basic scrutiny" and is based on "implausible assumptions." On Wednesday, Edmunds.com released a study that argued Cash for Clunkers did not have a great impact on the auto industry. The report said that 690,000 new vehicles were sold under the program last summer, but that only 125,000 of them would not have been sold without the Clunkers rebates. As a result, the report said, the administration's economic claims for the program "have been rendered quite weak."

The Clunkers program gave car buyers rebates of up to $4,500 if they traded in less fuel-efficient vehicles for new vehicles that met certain fuel economy requirements. A total of $3 billion was allotted for those rebates. The Edmunds report also said that taxpayers shelled out an average of $24,000 per car sold as a result of the program. But the White House fired back, saying Thursday's Commerce Department report that showed auto sales contributed 1.7 percentage points to the economy's 3.5% growth rate in the third quarter is proof that Cash for Clunkers had a meaningful impact on both auto sales and the broad economy. "Edmunds.com has released a faulty analysis," the blog post said. "This is the latest of several critical analyses of the Cash for Clunkers program from Edmunds.com, which appear designed to grab headlines and get coverage on cable TV." The administration argued that Edmunds' conclusions were incorrect because the study assumes that the market for cars that didn't qualify for Clunkers was unaffected by the program. "In other words, all the other cars were being sold on Mars," said the administration.

The administration's blog post argued that Clunkers helped to lower auto prices on the rest of the vehicle market as well, a fact the administration said Edmunds ignored. The White House also said that people were drawn into dealerships because of the program and ended up purchasing cars even if their trade-in didn't qualify for the program. Cash for Clunkers will have a long-term impact on the overall economy, since automakers increased their production through the end of the year to meet demand created by the program, the administration said. Finally, the administration said the Edmunds' report flies in the face of independent analyses, and the administration's Council of Economic Advisers. The blog urged readers to "put on your space suit and compare the two approaches yourself." Edmunds stands by its report: In response, Edmunds.com said Thursday that its figures were correct, and that the growth in GDP had more to do with naturally recovering auto sales and not with incentive programs.

The company also said that there was no hard evidence of consumers buying cars after discovering they didn't qualify for the rebate. "It does, after all, seem a bit odd that masses of consumers would elect to buy a vehicle because of a program for which they don't qualify -- doubly so when you add in the fact that prices shot up during Cash for Clunkers, creating a disincentive to buy," Edmunds said in a statement. In the end, Edmunds said the report actually shows that there is some good news about the auto industry -- the recovering economy is helping boost auto sales even without the help of Clunkers. "With all respect to the White House, Edmunds.com thinks that instead of shooting the messenger, government officials should take heart from the core message of the analysis: the fundamentals of the auto marketplace are improving faster than the current sales numbers suggest."

Saab 9-5 wagon (next generation)

Opinions have been mixed over the overall shape of the new Saab 9-5. The detailing, as we found at the pivotal sedan's debut at the recently concluded Frankfurt show, takes the Swedish automaker's aerospace-inspired design to a new level of sophistication, but some believe that the silhouette cut by the sedan's form left something lacking. That could all be fixed, however, if the estate wagon comes out looking as slick as this rendering imagines.

Slated for debut in about a year from now, the 9-5 SportCombi, as Trollhattan calls its wagons, is scheduled to be the first new launch for Saab after leaving GM for Koenigsegg's management. Following the market debut of the sedan, the 9-5 wagon will precede the replacement for the smaller 9-3 and the anticipated new 9-4X crossover to give the Swedes a solid lineup to take on the likes of Audi and company. Engines are expected to include turbo fours displacing 1.6 liters and producing 178 horsepower, two liters with 217 hp and 2.8 liters with 296 hp; to be joined by a 158 hp two-liter turbodiesel and a reported turbocharged hybrid option. Saab's trick proprietary XWD traction system should be available across nearly the entire range.

With all that, plus Swedish practicality and what looks to be a slick wraparound rear windscreen, the next wagon from Scandinavia's quirky stepchild could be a real departure from the usual Saab story.

Kia Forte

Likes: Peppy performance, roomy interior, many features for the money, stylish and affordable.

Dislikes: Questionable resale value, looks like a Honda Civic at front, and a Audi A4 at rear, Honda Civic may offer better residual value overall.

Overall: An attractive little sedan, with great value and plenty of kit for the money, although it looks rather very similar to the Civic. Still great value for the money. Resale value maybe one of it's weak points.

Five used car red flags

One of the most important aspects of a used car is its maintenance history. You want to make sure you're buying a vehicle that has had routine oil changes and major mileage services. Always ask the seller, even if it's a car dealership, for all service records. If they can't provide those for you, you have no way of knowing if the car has been maintained properly. In addition to asking for records, look for a windshield sticker indicating when the car's next oil change is due. If there's no sticker or it shows an oil change is past due, ask why.

A vehicle history report is essential for any car purchase. You can ask the seller or dealership for the report or access it yourself online using the car's VIN (Vehicle Identification Number). AutoCheck charges $19.99 for a single report or $29.99 for unlimited reports for 60 days. The report shows accident/damage history as well as title problems, frame damage and an odometer rollback check -- any of which should be deal breakers.

A quick look under the car can reveal fluid leaks, but unless you're an expert, you'll need to have someone else do a thorough inspection to make sure it's in good working condition. A PPI, or Pre-Purchase Inspection, is performed by a neutral third party (such as a certified mechanic or automotive technician) and costs about $100 to $200.

The inspection is a detailed assessment of the cosmetic and mechanical condition of the vehicle. It is an invaluable asset since it can alert you to problems, maintenance issues and even frame damage hiding under the surface. The mechanic should put the car on a lift to check undercarriage components. Make sure he or she also uses a paint meter gauge to catch any re-painted body panels -- which mean the car may have been in accidents that weren't reported to the insurance company (if they had been reported, they would show up on your AutoCheck vehicle history report). Choose the party who will perform the inspection, rather than going with someone recommended by the seller. Ask to have the results sent directly to you.

You may be tempted to skip a PPI, but it's almost always well worth it. You're making a large investment in a vehicle, and the price of the PPI is only a very small fraction of that. If any problems the PPI shows are deal breakers, you can walk away from the sale. If not, you can still use them to negotiate a better price.

Your AutoCheck vehicle report will show any problem titles on the car's record at any point in its history -- everything from hail damage to fire damage. Most of these issues are red flags, but here's just a sampling of those to avoid at all costs: Flood titles, which means the vehicle has received extensive water damage; salvage titles, which mean an insurance company has at some point declared the car a total loss due to sustained damage; and junk titles, which mean the vehicle indicate that a vehicle is not safe enough for use and the car cannot be titled again in that state.

A problem-free title doesn't mean it's valid. Criminals can create counterfeit or fraudulent titles and use them to legally register and then sell stolen cars. If you buy a car without a valid title, it's the worst-case scenario -- you don't legally own the car you just bought.

The first step to verify the title is to check with the DMV. Usually, you'll just need the car's VIN number and may be charged a small fee (often these transactions require you to go to the DMV's office). You need to make sure the VIN on the car matches the VIN on the title and the seller's name matches the one on the title. This record check is also valuable because it will show any outstanding liens on the title, which means that the owner is still making payments on the car and doesn't own it outright. This could complicate the sale later, especially if you're buying from a private seller.

However, even if the title appears to belong to the seller, it could still be fraudulent. There are a few signs that may signify foul play. Play close attention if the vehicle was recently brought to your state and titled or if the VIN number on the car is obscured or shows signs of tampering. The title should look official, meaning it will be printed on special paper with watermarks (visible when held up to the light). All text, graphics and borders should be sharp, not blurred. If you can, compare the title with an original (perhaps from a friend's car in the same state) and make sure the two look the same.

Checking for all these red flags may seem excessive, but they can save you time and headaches down the line. In the end, the PPI, AutoCheck vehicle history report, DMV records and seller should be consistent. If any of the information seems fishy, consider walking away from the sale. If any of the above warning signs do surface, you may not even want to give the car a second thought. It doesn't hurt to walk away, but it can sure hurt a lot to buy a problem vehicle. Plus, with the internet, you can find virtually any car, anywhere. And as they say, there are plenty of other fish in the sea.

Suzuki Reno (Short take)

Likes: Zippy around town, stylish for an economy car, small exterior - roomy interior, comfortable ride on the highway.

Dislikes: Body roll that's too noticeable for a small car, more of a cruiser than a car for speed, long stopping distance for a small car, steering doesn't adjust for reach, fuel economy not so impressive.

Overall: Although the Suzuki Reno is out of production. This car is still a good option for those who do most of their driving in the city. If you're going to do more than city driving. Make sure you find a Reno with ABS and slightly larger 15 inch alloy wheels. The base wheels and tires translates to a bumpy ride on rough surface.

Acura TSX wagon for U.S.

Long before the controversial 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour was announced, we’d been asking Honda to bring us its sexy Euro-only Accord Tourer wagon. Our wish finally has been granted—but the Tourer won’t be wearing a Honda badge like it does in Europe. Instead, you’ll be seeing it in Acura TSX duds, hauling kiddies to soccer practice and shopping bags from the mall beginning in the fall of 2010.

While little information has been released on the TSX Sport Wagon, Acura promises that the wagon will feature balanced performance, advanced technology, and bold styling. Translation: expect it to be slow and look just like the already-bold Accord Tourer (no surprise; the Euro Accord sedan is sold here as the TSX) with Acura’s beak-style grille, and likely housing the same 201-hp, 2.4-liter four-cylinder from the base sedan. The TSX’s newly available, 280-hp V-6 is also a possibility.

Now that Cadillac has released its CTS Sport Wagon, Acura appears to feel it can no longer sit on the sidelines while the CTS, Audi A4 Avant, and BMW 3-series wagon own the premium small-wagon segment. We love wagons here at C/D, so all we can say is, “let the games begin.”

More fuel efficient Ram?

According to The Detroit News, the big joint development program formed several years ago between General Motors, Daimler, Chrysler and BMW to develop a two-mode hybrid system for light duty vehicles is over. With all four automakers now having launched versions of the gas-electric system, the joint program is being wound down and the Troy, Michigan office where engineers from each company collaborated will be closed by the end of this year. Most of the joint work actually ended last June and many of the staff have already been relocated to other facilities.

The Mercedes-Benz ML450 hybrid and BMW X6 ActiveHybrid are both going into production right about now using a version of the two mode transmission built by Daimler. Chrysler, which briefly built a version of the Durango and Aspen SUVs with the hybrid system last year, remains committed to re-launching the system in the Ram pickups in 2010. At this point, however, it looks unlikely that the planned light-duty hybrid will launch anytime soon in the Ram 1500.

Thanks for reading

Please keep all comments related to the blog. All other comments that are found to be offensive, or any others will be removed. Thanks and keep reading. More blogs will be coming Wed...

Tata Nano steering failure

If we weren't car guys, we could understand the attraction of a bare-bones car with a sticker price coming in at a fraction of a conventional car's. Heck, we still do. But we know as well as you do that in order to get the pricing that low, corners probably have to be cut somewhere. And when you're dealing with a metal cage in which you sit surrounded by glass, propelled by a controlled series of explosions and managed by a complex mess of wires and electronics, you don't want to be cutting corners.

So we can't say we're entirely surprised with news of early problems with the Tata Nano. The vehicle that's anticipated to mobilize India has been launched in its domestic market prior to being exported overseas, but three customers have already reported small fires spontaneously igniting inside the vehicle, causing the automaker to launch an investigation.

The problem reportedly stems from faulty wiring in the ignition switch that has, in these three cases reported so far, caused smoke and certain parts around the steering column to melt. Two of the customers have returned their Nanos to their respective dealerships, which have repaired the problem at no charge. One buyer, however, has yet to bring his car in for repairs and has lodged a complaint with law enforcement officials.

So far, Tata isn't issuing a recall notice, but it is conducting a "pre-delivery audit" of the car's electrical systems for those still in their possession and offering to inspect those units it has already sold.

Short take: Dodge Avenger

Dodge Avenger SXT

Likes: Bold in your face styling, roomy interior, plenty of pick up power, interior somewhat of an improvement over the Stratus.

Dislikes: Styling may push some away, some blind spots from the interior out, engine is somewhat buzzy when pushed hard.

Overall: The Avenger provides a bold styled sedan to the somewhat boring mid-sized sedan segment. Although it's not the best in its class. It's still worth looking at if you don't want a Honda Accord or Toyota Camry.

Five of the most over priced cars

Subaru Legacy

For 2010, Subaru redesigned the Legacy, its midsize sedan. However, there are still some 2009 models on dealer lots. Since the 2009 models are likely to have heavy discounts so dealers can make way for the 2010 models, a 2009 Legacy can seem like a good deal -- especially since its $20,795 starting price includes all-wheel drive. Currently, buyers are paying a national average price of about $19,000 for the 2009 Legacy; that's below invoice price. However, with IntelliChoice estimating the 2009 Legacy's five-year cost of ownership at $35,603, paying below invoice doesn't seem like such a deal. A better long-term value for a midsize car is the 2009 Toyota Prius. Like the Legacy, the 2009 Prius is the last model year before a 2010 redesign, so dealers may be willing to negotiate on price. The 2009 Prius starts at $22,000, but IntelliChoice says the Prius should only cost $25,365 to own over five years.

Dodge Grand Caravan

Looking for minivan? You're probably looking at the Dodge Grand Caravan. Not only is the Dodge credited with launching the minivan segment, but it's the only domestic automaker still in the minivan biz. The Grand Caravan features innovative seating arrangements, a rear-seat entertainment system and handy storage cubbies. It gets even more tempting when you consider the nearly $4,500 cash back that Dodge has been offering in some parts of the country.

But, while it's cheap at the dealership, IntelliChoice says the Grand Caravan isn't the best long-term value. Over five years the Grand Caravan will cost you $43,050 to own, when you factor in repairs, depreciation and maintenance costs. That's twice what a discounted model costs. Compare that to the Toyota Sienna minivan, which, even with its higher starting price, only costs $40,390 to own over five years, according to IntelliChoice. That value gets even better. According to pricing firm TrueCar, buyers in early October are actually paying a national average price of $23,788 for the Grand Caravan, and an average national price of $23,642 for the Sienna. That's not a huge price difference up front, but over the long haul, the Dodge Grand Caravan is one overpriced van.

Chevrolet Cobalt

The conventional wisdom is that compact car shoppers are trying to save a little cash by opting for basic transportation. The problem is, sometimes that basic transportation can end up costing more in the long run. Take the Chevrolet Cobalt. Chevy's been offering it with zero-percent financing -- and with a starting price of $14,990, it's a pretty affordable option.

Over the long term, that changes. IntelliChoice says that over five years, the Cobalt will cost about $31,916 to own. That's more than twice the national average price of $15,042 that buyers are paying for the Cobalt. For a better option, check out the Honda Civic Hybrid. Yes, it costs more up front than the Cobalt, but over five years, IntelliChoice says it only costs $26,993 to own. With car shoppers currently paying an average of about $23,000 nationally for the Civic Hybrid, that means the car's exceptionally low depreciation, fuel and maintenance costs make it a lot cheaper than the Cobalt. If you can't swing the upfront costs of the Civic Hybrid, opt for the regular Civic. In early October, the average price people are paying nationally for one is about $15,000. Plus, it has a total cost of ownership of $28,375, saving you over $4,000 as compared to the Cobalt.

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Compact SUVs are quickly becoming the station wagon for the current generation of families. They offer utility in a tidy package and many can be great values. But not all of them are. The Suzuki Grand Vitara has a base price of about $18,500, which is average for the class. Its extra-long warranty can make it seem like an excellent value. But its five year cost of ownership -- a whopping $39,434 -- tells a different story. A better value is the Toyota RAV4. It starts at about $2,000 more than the Grand Vitara, but over five years will cost you $33,336 to own according to IntelliChoice, so you'll end up saving $4,000. In some regions, Toyota is offering cash back on the RAV4 or zero-percent financing, which only adds to your savings.

Ford Explorer

Midsize SUVs are for people who need more power and space than a compact SUV can deliver. The Ford Explorer can do both, and recently Ford has been offering the 2009 Explorer with about $4,500 cash back in some regions (the 2009 and 2010 models are essentially the same, so you might as well buy the 2009 model and get the discount). Sound like a deal? Not according to IntelliChoice. The five-year cost of ownership on the Explorer is $48,280, almost twice what you'll pay at the dealership. If you opt for the Toyota Highlander instead, you'll see a total cost of ownership of $41,089 over five years, saving you about $7,000. Plus, Toyota is offering $1,000 cash back on the Highlander in some regions and zero-percent financing in others, helping you save even more

Mitsubishi i

Mitsubishi plans to roll out its i MiEV electric car around the world, including the U.S. To that end, the company showed a left-hand-drive version—which debuted at this year’s Geneva show in March—at the 2009 New York auto show.

This version of the i MiEV is strictly a prototype at this point, as evidenced by the fanciful lighting elements, including funky bubble lamps on the front bumper, sweet-looking lighted knobs in the interior, and LED headlights. None of those are likely to make it to production, but they provide an upscale, chic look to the concept. We also like the circuitry-inspired upholstery.

All i MiEVs are based on the i minicar. Compared with the Japanese market i and i MiEV, however, this concept is wider by 3.7 inches up front and 5.3 inches at the rear. Widening the car has a twofold benefit: improved handling and stability, as well as increased interior room. The front and rear overhangs are also longer, resulting in 2.1 inches of extra length. The Prototype i MiEV’s cabin has an impressive amount of headroom, and two normal adults can sit in the rear seats comfortably with decent—okay, some—space between. There is no middle seat in back, so occupancy is limited to four.

Power comes from an air-cooled, 330-volt lithium-ion battery pack mounted under the floor and a synchronous permanent-magnet electric motor, which routes 63 hp and 133 lb-ft of torque to the rear wheels. Charging the batteries can be accomplished in 14 hours from a standard 110-volt outlet, or seven hours from a 220-volt source. A three-phase 220-volt quick-charge port is also built into the car, and allows for an 80-percent charge in 30 minutes. Range is 80 to 100 miles, with a top speed of 81 mph, according to Mitsubishi.

The smaller i MiEV goes on sale in Japan in the fall for the equivalent of about $30,000. At the same time, both the state of Oregon and the Portland General Electric company will begin U.S. tests of that Japanese-market car. Mitsubishi intends to be more active in the minicar and alternative-propulsion markets in the U.S., a strategy which could mean killing off some of its slower-selling conventional models such as the Endeavor SUV in favor of vehicles like the i MiEV. Word is that the i MiEV would have to be sold in the U.S. at that $30,000 price—or possibly even higher—to make it economically viable, so the non-MiEV, gasoline-fired i would have to pick up the slack volume-wise. That car would use the same basic 1.0-liter three-cylinder engine found in the rump of the Smart Fortwo and likely come in well under $20K. Mitsubishi is hoping to offer the i MiEV to U.S. consumers by 2012, if not earlier.

Ford Kuga

According to a report from Bloomberg, Ford will shift production of the Kuga small SUV from a plant in Saarlouis, Germany, to Louisville, Kentucky. Up to 80,000 American-made Kugas could be exported to Europe annually, according to the report. The Louisville plant currently builds the Ford Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer platform mates.

What we infer from the report is that the Kuga, currently not sold in the U.S., will replace the Ford Escape on our shores, although the Escape name could be retained. In July 2008, Ford announced that it would start building “small vehicles from Ford’s global C-car platform” at the Louisville plant by 2011. And at the same time, the company promised to bring six European cars based on its B- and C-platforms to the U.S. (which include models like the Euro Focus.) We think all this adds up to the Kuga replacing the aging Ford Escape sometime soon.

Nissan Micra replacement

Rumor has it that Nissan Motor Co.—purveyors of one of the cheapest cars on America’s roadways, the $10,620 Versa 1.6 sedan—wants something even simpler, smaller, and cheaper to sell in the U.S. According to Automotive News, Nissan is thinking about bringing us a microcar based on its new V platform in order to help make the architecture good for a million units worldwide.

The report says the car will be sold as a four-door sedan, five-door hatch, and an MPV, and will replace the Mini Cooper–sized Micra, which is sold in many markets around the world. The new car allegedly will be powered by a three-cylinder engine and will have a simple-to-assemble interior with about half the dashboard parts of the current Micra. It is also said to achieve a 50-percent improvement in fuel economy over the already efficient Micra. AN evidently wasn’t able to squeeze out any further details, such as the official name of the car nor when it might appear on these shores.

What we’re most curious about, however, is how the new car will fit into Nissan’s brand positioning as a pseudo-performance alternative to the industry leaders like Honda, Toyota, and Hyundai. On one hand, Mini proportions could yield Mini-like handling—a good thing; on the other hand, three-cylinder engines have us thinking Smart-like acceleration—not such a good thing. In any case, the new model will certainly go a long way to help the company meet more-stringent U.S. emissions and fuel-economy standards of the future. Whether it will meet our standards is an entirely separate matter.

Blogs will be posted this Saturday

Volkswagen Crossfox

Do you think Volkswagen should offer the CrossFox over here in the United States? Leave a comment below...

Smart Crossblade

The Smart Crossblade was one of those special vehicles that only see 1,000 units. I'd love to test drive this vehicle. It looks fun to drive. Designed around the concept of a motorcycle. It has four wheels so you won't have to worry about the balancing act. Waterproof interior and is slightly faster than the standard Smart. Although it was sold only in Europe. This would be a great vehicle to drive on a nice sunny warm day. Just driving along the lakefront or around the city in. This doesn't seem like a vehicle that would replace a conventional vehicle, due to the restrictions it has. No windscreen, no doors and no roof. But I still like the concept and I still would love to have one.

Lincoln Park/ Lakeview Chicago

I've been thinking about moving into either the Lakeview area or Lincoln Park area. The apartments up there are so nice looking. Although they are rather expensive. I still have my sights on living up there. But there's one thing that's kind of keeping me from wanting to live up there. That's the sign I posted above. I'm kind of skeptical about living in this area because I'll have to pay for that permit every year to park on the street. Plus if I had a visitor come. They won't be able to park around my house. What do you think of Permit parking? Or the area? Leave a comment below...

Saab 9-5 wagon (flash back)

Officially, the story from Saab last September was that our car was a well-worn pre-production example. After suffering heavy-duty use during a press preview drive in April of 1999, it then toured Western states with a wide-ranging sample of automotive journalists behind the wheel. The car had had a rough life. Under scrutiny was a Saab 9-5 SE Wagon that had just stranded one of our writers on Interstate 70 west of Denver, and we wanted to know why a $38,000 luxury car with 5,000 miles on the odometer had completely crapped out on the side of the road.

Apparently, the air-conditioning compressor seized, which caused oil to leak on the serpentine drive belt, which caused the belt to slip off, rendering the car undriveable. Fortunately, we had a cell phone with us and were able to contact Saab's roadside assistance operator, who informed us it might be a couple of hours before help arrived. Instead, a tow-truck driver happened by and asked if we needed help in reaching the local Denver Saab dealer. We took him up on his offer to expedite the trip home.

Saab was eager to have us drive the car again after repairs, and we agreed to do so, but our schedule wasn't clear until recently. Now that we've had a trouble-free week in the 9-5 Wagon, we're ready to report that though a stylish and capable piece of work, we're not sure the price premium commanded for this family hauler is worthwhile.

Breaking down only served to cement this impression. Recent test-drives in competing, and usually less expensive, wagons also kept us from liking the 9-5. Certainly, this Swedish automaker is haunted by a reputation for sketchy quality, but there are design and content flaws inherent in the 9-5 that must be called into question.

For a vehicle intended to transport well-to-do families, there's very little storage designed for the detritus that accompanies said family. The center console contains a secondary, albeit removable, cupholder that eats up most of the space. The small front and rear door bins are oddly shaped. The dash slot is too thin to hold some cell phones. There are magazine pockets on the backs of both front seats, an adequate glove box, and a good-sized storage well in the left rear cargo panel that looks like it should house a CD changer, but otherwise, this Saab provides no space to stash stuff.

Part of the storage issue, at least for front-seat occupants, could be resolved by relocating the ignition from its present location between the seats to a more conventional spot on the dash or steering column. Ditto the power window controls, which are on the center console rather than the door panels. Though it is Saab tradition to have the ignition "on the floor," this quirk is tiresome as we move into the next century. Plus, the giant black key fob interferes with the window controls.

While we're discussing the key fob, let's mention that it is large enough to solicit pickle jokes when stuffed into a front pocket, and so poorly marked that it is virtually impossible to discern what buttons control the various locking and unlocking functions in anything less than broad daylight.

Equipped with $520 front and rear heated seats and a trick $425 sliding load floor that can support one pound per dollar spent on this option, our $38,420 Saab did not have ventilated leather and the standard premium audio system was unable to deliver the quality of sound we expect from Harmon Kardon components. We did get automatic dual-zone climate control that senses whether a front-seat passenger is on board. When you're driving alone, the system acts like a single-zone setup. Another bonus is that the temperature control ascends and descends in increments of two, making it easier to cool or warm the cabin quickly.

Other interior pluses include industrial-strength adjustable cargo tie-down tracks in back and a sturdy cargo cover. Dashboard buttons have a high-quality look and durable rubberized texture, combined with the silky movement usually associated with Lexus products. After the sun goes down, a Night Panel feature dims all secondary gauges and switches, leaving just a 90-mph speedometer to distract your eyes in the dark. We entertained ourselves with the simple yet elegant joystick vent controls, pivoting front map light, and aviation-style "fasten seatbelts" sign.

Saab has gone to great lengths to ensure occupant safety with the 9-5 Wagon. Extensive crash testing was conducted during the engineering phase of the 9-5. A specially designed B-pillar helps dissipate crash energy before it intrudes on the cabin, while side airbags designed to protect both the head and torso manage the remaining force that threatens passengers. Force-reducing and pre-tensioning seatbelts help prevent belt-induced injury, while Saab's Active Head Restraint system reduces the chance for whiplash in a rear-end collision.

Powered by an "Ecopower" asymmetrically turbocharged 3.0-liter V6 making 200 horsepower at 5,000 rpm and 229 ft-lbs. of torque at 2,500 rpm (with a fat reserve of twist all the way to 4,000 rpm), the 9-5 Wagon accelerated strongly in Denver's thin atmosphere. There is a slight stumble off the line as the turbo spools up, but then a steady rush of power is on tap all the way to extralegal speeds. With the four-speed automatic transmission in "Sport" mode, the car holds gears longer for more aggressive acceleration, but each time the Saab is shut off, so is the "Sport" mode. There's also a "Winter" mode that provides second-gear starts for better traction on icy or snowy surfaces.

Ride quality from the front strut and rear multilink underpinnings is mushy, like a Buick Century, and it feels like the bump stops are encountered often, resulting in the impression that the Saab is undersuspended. At least feedback through the steering is good, so that the driver has some idea what's happening at the road surface. Roll control could be better, with our test example exhibiting scuffed front sidewalls from over-enthusiastic drivers who had plowed the Saab around hairpin turns. Brakes perform remarkably well and the pedal is easy to modulate, but the beautiful five-spoke alloy wheels quickly become coated with a thick sheen of brake dust, requiring constant cleaning that results in filthy fingernails.

Stylish good looks can't overcome our remaining gripes with this car. Real walnut interior trim manages to look fake and the center armrest slides irritatingly fore and aft when you lean on it to extract change from your left pocket. Strangely for a Saab, the eight-way power driver's seat doesn't offer optimal adjustment for a perfect driving position because the bottom cushion height and tilt features cannot provide maximum lift of both buttocks and thighs simultaneously. Furthermore, the funky smell of the leather clings to clothing after exiting the car, there are no cross bars on the roof surface to protect the paint from strap-on car-top carriers, and road rumble precludes rear-seat occupants from enjoying conversation with front-seat riders.

Perhaps the breakdown we suffered unfairly colored our impressions of the Saab 9-5 Wagon. After all, it is quite unusual for a test vehicle supplied by an automaker to a journalist to be in less than tip-top shape, much less strand us on the side of the highway. But, giving Saab the benefit of the doubt and assuming that the mechanical malfunction was attributable to this car's specific history, there still isn't much here to convince us that the front-wheel-drive 9-5 is worth a $10,000 price premium over well-equipped wagons from Subaru or Volkswagen, or similarly priced all-wheel-drive models from Audi and Volvo.

New Saab 9-5

With new owner Koenigsegg, Saab future does look very bright. Especially with this very attractive looking 9-5 sedan that appeared at the Frankfurt Autoshow. The interior still has that aircraft design cues. Much of the platform was shared with the Vauxhall Insigna. It will be on sale here in the United States next year. Undercutting rivals such as the Audi A6 and BMW 5 Series. Saab says that they used the conventional three-box design rather than the fastback cliche or four-door coupe look. Apparently the VW Passat CC, Audi A5 sport back and Mercedes CLS are all prime examples of cliche looks. There will be a wagon version appearing later. Hopefully with this new owner. Saab will be able to get it's 'quirky' image back.

Ford's biggest recall

DETROIT (AP) -- Ford Motor Co. said Tuesday it will add 4.5 million older-model vehicles to the long list of those recalled because a defective cruise control switch could cause a fire.

The latest voluntary action pushes Ford's total recall due to faulty switches to 14.3 million registered vehicles over 10 years, capping the company's largest cumulative recall in history involving a single problem.

The recall covers 1.1 million Ford Windstar minivans that had a small risk of fire due to internal leaking from the switches. Ford said in a letter to federal regulators that it found a small number of reported fires linked to the problem during an internal investigation that began last year, but did not specify how many.

The remaining 3.4 million vehicles are Ford, Lincoln and Mercury models. Ford said there were no reports of fires with those models, most of them trucks and sport utility vehicles, but that they were included in the recall because they use the same switches. All vehicles covered by the recall are from the 1992 to 2003 model years.

Ford advised owners of all vehicles covered by the recall to park them outside until they are mailed instructions by the end of the month on how to get repairs.

The Dearborn, Mich.-based automaker has struggled for a decade with the problem, which has prompted hundreds of complaints and dozens of lawsuits over fires allegedly caused by faulty switches. A small number of injuries have also been linked to the problem, though none were reported in the latest recall. Previous recalls included some of Ford's most popular brands, like the popular F-series of pickup trucks.

Ford began an investigation of Windstar vehicles in February 2008 after receiving a growing number of reports of fires under the vehicles' hoods, according to a letter the company sent to the National Highway Transportation Safety Agency late last week announcing the recall. In June 2008, NHTSA began its own probe of the problem.

Investigators found that the switches, made by Texas Instruments, could leak internally, overheat and potentially ignite. NHTSA also identified four reports of leaking fluid damaging the antilock brake control module, resulting in a fire. The module is charged with electrical current and can ignite the fluid in rare cases, said Ford spokesman Wes Sherwood.

Even some vehicles without cruise control are part of the recall because they still have the switches with brake fluid routed through them. To repair the problem, dealers will install a harness to help prevent the fluid from flowing anywhere it could be ignited.

Ford stopped using the Texas Instruments switch in 2003, according to Sherwood. The latest group of vehicles recalled is the last batch still on the road that had the switch installed.

Texas Instruments said in a statement that it manufactured a switch "to meet and exceed Ford's specifications" and that it is only one component of Ford's cruise control deactivation system. The company cited a 2006 NHTSA investigation that found multiple factors were to blame for fires. Texas Instruments no longer owns the division that made the switches.

NHTSA spokesman Rae Tyson said Ford "is to be commended for stepping forward to resolve this issue."

The recall covers the following model years: 1995-2003 Ford Windstar; 2000-2003 Ford Excursion diesel; 1993-1997 and 1999-2003 Ford F-Super Duty diesel; 1992-2003 Ford Econoline; 1995-2002 Ford Explorer; 1995-2002 Mercury Mountaineer; 1995-1997 and 2001-2003 Ford Ranger; and 1994 Ford F35 Motorhome vehicles.

Unknown car feature, anyone?

I'm curious as to finding out this car feature. I've seen it on various luxury cars. The driver seat moves foward to the position that you saved it in. Then moves back when you shut the car off and the side mirrors fold in. I seen this on a Mercedes SUV. But I've never been able to figure out what the name of the feature is. If anyone knows what I'm talking about. Leave a comment below. Thanks.

Auto News 2009

Fiat 500 ($19,000)

With Fiat now owning Chrysler. Fiat will be able to bring over this cute 500 model. A retr0-throw back to the original 500. The new 500 comes with a large range of petrol and diesel engines. The Abarth (sport model) comes with a turbocharged 133hp four-cylinder engine with twin-exhaust pipes and a five-speed manual gearbox. Sales are planned by mid-2010 or late 2010. It's cute and charming. Will give the Mini Cooper a good run for it's money.

Ford Flex Ecoboost V6 ($36,700)

Designed to offer performance like a V8. With fuel economy of a V6. The EcoBoost V6 features two-turbochargers to produce 355hp. This option maybe for those who test drove the base 3.5-liter V6 and felt it was a tad underpowered. For a 4,800lb vehicle, it can accelerate to 60 in less than six seconds. Which is pretty impressive. This is the closest to a Taurus SHO wagon we'll get. With V8 like fuel economy and some options being rather expensive. The Ford Flex is still a stylish alternative to the many various crossovers out there.

Cadillac CTS wagon ($44,050)

BMW 5 Series too expensive? Audi A6 out of your league? How about a Cadillac CTS wagon? Designed to take on the German Luxury Wagons. The CTS wagon is very stylish and comes with plenty of horsepower. 306hp to be exact. Although most Americans won't notice this wagon. We say however that if you don't want a luxury sport utility vehicle; and you're tired of overpriced Euro Wagons. We'd give the Cadillac CTS wagon a good glance. A Cadillac that's not boring, wow! That's worth a look!

Chevy Volt

The Chevy Volt is going to start around $35,000 - $40,000. With it's breakthrough technology under the hood. Are you willing to pay a premium for a Volt? Leave a comment below

60 day guarantee, good idea or flop?

60 day guarantee?

Will GM win back buyers? Or is this another attempt that will fail to lure the American Public? Leave a comment below. Tell me what you think.

Hummer: SOLD!

General Motors announced on October 09, 2009 that they have sold their entire stake in the Hummer brand to Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery and a group of private investors (Mr. Suolang Duoji, a private entrepreneur with holdings that include the Hong Kong-listed thenardite producer Lumena, will hold the remaining 20 percent stake.). Sichuan now owns 80% of the company, Autoblog reports. The sale will net GM around $150 million, although the transaction still has to be approved by both U.S. and Chinese regulatory agencies, which could come later this year or in early 2010. The deal includes manufacturing to continue in the two plants that GM already uses to produce the Hummer trucks through June of 2011, with a possible extension until 2012.

Mercedes-Benz Brabus SV12 R

Mercedes-Benz obsessed tuner Brabus has something very special planned for the 2009 Frankfurt Motor Show next week. The tuning firm will show its new Brabus SV12 R, the world’s fastest and most powerful luxury sedan and we expect nothing less of the German company.

Power will come from an upgraded 6.3L V12 twin-turbo engine making an outstanding 750-hp with a maximum torque of 995 lb-ft. That allows the Brabus SV12 R to go from 0 to 62 mph in just 4 seconds, 124 mph in just 11.9 seconds with an electronically-limited top speed of 211 mph. Power is driven to the rear wheels via a modified 5-speed automatic transmission.

By now you’re probably already looking at the high-res image gallery so we’ll save our breath and leave it up to the pictures to show you the visual enhancements made to the SV12 R.

BMW News

Er--- is it a wagon? Is it a hatchback? The rear trunk can be opened like a sedan, as well as a hatchback/wagon. With plenty of headroom like a wagon. So what do you call it? BMW calls it a 5 Series Gran Turismo. But other than the versatility and roomy rear seat. The whole concept is to provide a little more room than a sedan. With more versatility than a sedan. But without looking like a wagon. Or a hatchback? I'm not sure if I hit the nail right on the head. But this is one stylish looking BMW. Although it will start at (sigh) $67,000. This is one of those vehicles that won't be in reach for all. But I do love the style. Just wish that it wasn't so expensive. There will be a 3 Series Gran Turismo or GT that will appear with the next generation 3 Series. The Next BMW M5 will use a smaller displacement twin-turbocharged V8 engine. Which is rumored to be rated near 600hp! The current M5 is pretty much set the benchmark for sports sedans. But using a V8 with 600hp should be more interesting. Expect the next M5 to come within a year of the next generation 5 Series. The X1 (based on the 1 Series coupe platform) should also be a very interesting offer for BMW's line-up. Although it's rather strange to have the X1 alongside the BMW 3 Series Wagon. Styling wise isn't really BMW-ish. But I do like the look it it. Expect both six-cylinders from the 1 Series to appear in the X1. And twin-turbo diesel producing 201hp. The 7 series is now available with the X-Drive all-wheel-drive system. As well as a 6.0L V12 producing 535hp. The next generation BMW X3 will appear this Decemeber. Rumors says that the new X3 will share the same familiar 3.0liter engines. With a twin-turbocharged six-cylinder producing 306hp.

Dedicated to Mini Cooper slick Marketing

Parked too far from curb

This is kind of a rant blog about my misfortune with a traffic cop. I parked my car and went inside of a Jewel Osco. I exit the store maybe less than twenty-minutes later. Noticed a traffic cop was walking around my car. I walked up to the officer and asked what's the problem? Apparently I'm too far from the curb. I never thought that you could get a ticket for parking too far from the curb. I didn't even notice that I was too close from the curb. The traffic cop let me go with a warning. But out of my curiosity has anyone ever heard or recieved a parking ticket for parking too far from the curb. If you notice the car in front of the white van in the photo to the left. That's the closest picture I could demostrate of how far I was from the curb. I may have been a little bit closer. But what do you think? Leave a comment below.

2009 Worst

Here are a list of vehicles that are either pointless or horrible. Enjoy!

(In no particular order)

Cadillac Escalade EXT

Avoid: If you're going to buy a pick-up truck. To do things that normal pick-up truck drivers do. Why not buy a Chevy Silverado? Or maybe a Nissan Titan? Why one earth would anyone spend $60,000 on a pick-up truck that won't be used for it's real purpose?

Saab 9-7x

Avoid: Just because you put Swedish styling on a Chevy, does not make it a Saab. This has to be one of the worst Saabs to ever see production. It was so embarrasing that Saab never sold it in Europe. If you want a true Saab SUV. Wait for the 9-4x. It's promised to be a real Saab inside out.

Chevy Aveo/ Pontiac G3

Avoid: You'd think that small cars couldn't get any worst than this. You're very wrong! Very wrong indeed. The Chevy Aveo is one of the worst economy cars you can buy. It's poor handling, medicore power and steller styling makes it feel like a nightmare on four wheels. Makes you wonder, do people buy this to torture themselves? Pontiac offers a rebadged version of the G3. No wonder Pontiac is going out of production. With cars like that in it's line-up.

BMW X6

Avoid: The BMW X5 is pretty nice looking. The X3 is outdated in design. But still nice looking. The X6, well I don't know where the X6 fits in this picture. But the biggest question is, what is it supposed to be? A four-door SUV coupe? If you really want to stand out and have hefty pockets. You can buy one. But why would you when the X5 is much roomier, more practical and cost less.

Mercedes CLS

Avoid: This was the first four-door coupe. A coupe is a two-door car. So why would anyone want a sedan with a coupe profile? With a hefty price tag and limited headroom for rear passengers. It makes the rear doors pointless. The whole car maybe attractive in design. But if you want a coupe buy a coupe. Want a sedan buy a sedan. Why on earth would you want a four-door coupe?

Smart Fortwo

Avoid: The whole concept of a urban city car is great! The idea of having a small carbon foot print while having a stylish safe car is also a plus. But why did Smart have to attach the most awful transmission they could find? When you accelerate, the transmission pauses then shifts. The jerkiness of the shifting makes the idea seem horrible. You see one and love it. But when you drive it, you hate it.

Jeep Compass

Avoid: Jeep has a hertiage known for off-road vehicles. But if you ever came across this in Jeep's line up. You'd be embarrased for Jeep. It's a very bad poseur. It should be good for some off-roading like the Land Rover LR2 (which stays true to the brand). Why would anyone want to buy a Jeep that doesn't do what Jeeps are supposed to do? Pointless!

Volkswagen Routan

Avoid: Some ideas should be left ideas. The Routan is one of those ideas. Using the Dodge Caravan to design a minivan with 'German Engineering'. But in reality both vans are made in the same factory. The only difference is the cosmetic changes to both exterior and interior. Plus the handling is slightly better on the Volkswagen. But what minivan driver will be testing the handling? And who on earth would spend $40,000 on a minivan?

Mercedes R-Class

Avoid: You'd think minivans couldn't get more expensive. Nope you haven't seen the R-Class. Based on the now gone Chrysler Pacifica. Supposedly a luxurious crossover for those who don't want to drive a minivan. But seeing the many cheaper better options. It makes you wonder, are you really that fearful of your image? And do you really need to pay $50,000 for a crossover that any other crossover can do better and are cheaper to buy and own? The only thing it has going for it is the badge.

Mazda Tribute

Avoid: You have the Ford Escape. You have the Mercury Mariner. So where does the Tribute fit in this equation? All three are identical and all three use the same engines. So why do you need three copies of the same vehicle?

Kia Borrego

Avoid: It would've been nice if Kia relased this vehicle in 1990. When body-on-frame SUVs were popular. But with many SUVs switching to car platforms. You wonder why would anyone give up the smooth ride of a crossover, for the harshness of a body-on-frame SUV?

Hummer H3

Avoid: It was supposed to be the 'Baby Hummer' with easy to park size. Softer and more aimed towards city dwellers. But the blind spots are huge. It drinks gas like a Hummer. It's slow and heavy like a Hummer. With a strictly four-seat cabin. There are better SUVs out there that are better to drive. Good on gas and are much less 'in your face' styled.

Dodge Nitro

Avoid: Based on the Jeep Liberty platform. Both vehicles are horrible. The blind spots are large, the ride comfort is harsh. Thanks the large 20 inch alloy wheels. The interior quality is only so-so. The engines are only so-so. Fuel economy is below average. Almost like you're isolating yourself from the road and the world.

Pontiac G5

Avoid: The Chevy Cobalt (I did a little test drive of that in a earlier blog) is pretty much terrible. So Pontiac thought it would be a good idea to add an entry-level coupe to their line-up. It seemed like a good idea? Wrong! First of all, Pontiac is supposed to be a performance car company. Honestly we see why Pontiac is dying. Look at the products it has to show in it's line-up. (The G8, Vibe and G6 are the only good Pontiacs.)

BMW Hybrid, Land Rover updates it's line-up.

BMW wants to build the worlds most powerful Hybrid SUV. But does it really matter if you have a hybrid that has over 480hp under the hood? Well to answer a question that no one really asked. Nor did they ever decided they wanted one. The BMW ActiveHybrid X6 will be heading into production in 2010. Making an already purposeless SUV even more useless. The Jeep Cherokee's redesign is in jeopardy. Chrysler and Daimler are still entwined with each other. But Daimler doesn't want to share parts with Chrysler. Which means that the Jeep Cherokee which uses many parts from Daimler may cause a dispute. Which could result in the the launch of the next generation Jeep being pushed back or not even happening altogether. So far there isn't any ofical word as to the fate of this fairly nice looking SUV. The Smart Forfour could get another go. Yes the small compact hatchback that ever got a chance in the United States may have a chance. Mercedes is apparently talking to Renault with a possible partnership. This partnership could lead to a new Smart Forfour. But if Mercedes just simply keep the Mitsubishi Colt platform and redesign the current body design that was used between 2004 - 2006. Mercedes will cut cost of a new platform as well as have an attractive hatchback that will pull people from the dreadful Chevy Aveo and Kia Rio. Providing better more attractive alternatives for those who truly desire an urban city car. FYI please don't put a semi-automatic in this one. That's what made the Fortwo very undesirable to drive. Land Rover has decided that the LR3, Range-Rover and Range-Rover sport needed a little oomph under the hood. The LR3 which only had a V8 with 300hp was more of a lesiure vehicle. Land Rover has upgraded the engine to a 5.0Liter V8 with 375hp! All three will be using this engine in their base form. The Range Rover and Sport model will get an optional (I'm not joking when I say this) 5.0liter supercharged eight-cylinder with 510hp!! Just when you thought the 555hp BMW X5 M and X6 M weren't enough. You've got the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S with 55ohp. Don't forget the Mercedes ML AMG with 503hp from a 6.2 liter V8 engine. If Ferarri were to ever develop a SUV, it will probably have close to 600hp. Probably making it one of those SUVs you question their existance. What's next? The most powerful diesel SUV?

Similar design?

Does anyone else think these two SUVs are similar in design? One is a Lexus and the other is a Kia. Leave a comment below if you think these two trucks are simiar in design.

Say goodbye to Saturn and Pontiac

On September 30, 2009, Penske terminated its discussions with General Motors Company ("GM") to acquire the Saturn brand. The tentative agreement was for GM to continue to produce the Saturn line until 2011; after that time, an undisclosed third company would assume production responsibilities. Penske's decision to back out of the sale came after this undisclosed company's board rejected plans to take over production of the Saturn line. The undisclosed company was later reported to be Renault. Subsequently, GM stated they will shut down the brand and dealers will have to shut down by October 2010. Saturn owners will still be able to take their cars to Saturn dealerships for service until closure in 2010, after which point Saturn vehicles will be serviced at other GM dealerships.

On December 2, 2008, General Motors announced that it was considering eliminating numerous brands, including Pontiac, in order to appease Congress in hope of receiving a 25 billion dollar bailout. On February 17, 2009, GM originally proposed the elimination of its Saturn division, the sale of Saab, and either the sale or elimination of Hummer, depending on whether a buyer could be found quickly. In the original plan GM also clarified that Pontiac would have begun to focus on "niche" models aimed at the "youthful and sporty" segment, but did not provide specifics. Pontiac was to trim its number of models to four, although there was talk of retaining only one model. By April 2009 several automotive websites and business publications were reporting that GM was doing a study suggesting it might eliminate the brand altogether, along with sister truck brand GMC. On April 23 a report was published stating the company would be dropping the Pontiac brand while preserving the GMC truck line, as well as the Chevrolet, Cadillac, and Buick brands. The decision to eliminate Pontiac was made primarily due to the increasing threat of a bankruptcy filing if the June 1 deadline could not be met.

On April 27, 2009, GM officially announced that Pontiac will be dropped and that all of its remaining models will be phased out by the end of 2010.

General Motors will cut an additional 7,000 to 8,000 factory jobs in the United States and shed 2,600 dealers by 2010 under a revised business plan developed with the Obama administration. GM Chief Executive Officer Fritz Henderson said the Pontiac brand would be closed by 2010, calling it an “extremely personal decision.” In addition to speeding up decisions on Saturn, Saab and Hummer, GM will be left with four brands – Chevrolet, Buick, GMC and Cadillac.

Pontiac will become the second brand General Motors has eliminated in six years. Oldsmobile met the same fate in 2004 after being more slowly phased out over four years. Pontiac also becomes the eighth North American automobile brand since 1989 to be phased out, after Merkur, Passport, Asüna, Geo, Eagle, Plymouth, and Oldsmobile.

In early May, 2009, Jim Waldron, a Davison, Michigan Pontiac dealer, announced that he was interested in purchasing the Pontiac brand and logos, and had found financing to purchase them as well as some soon-to-be shuttered GM plants in order to build cars. Initially, GM said that, unlike Saturn, the brand was not for sale. But that statement was made before the official GM bankruptcy. As of mid June, Waldron indicated that GM has softened this stance, and that talks with GM relating to the purchase of the brand are continuing.

15 vehicles sold In Europe that achieve 56+ mpg

Power/ Running cost Avg. cons.

Mileage

mpg U.S.

Fiat 500 1.3 JTD Multijet 16V Pop 75 4.2 56

VW Golf 1.6 TDI BlueMotion 105 4.1 57

Skoda Fabia 1.4 TDI GreenLine 80 4.1 57

Opel Corsa 1.3 CDTI ecoFlex CO2 Pack 75 4.1 57

Audi A3 1.6 TDI Attraction 105 4.1 57

Toyota iQ 1.4 D-4D 90 4.0 59

Renault Twingo 1.5 dCi Rip Curl 84 4.0 59

Volvo S40 / V50 1.6D DRIVe Start/Stop 109 3.9 60

Volvo C30 1.6D DRIVe Start/Stop 109 3.9 60

Toyota Prius 1.8 Hybrid 136 3.9 60

Mini One D 90 3.9 60

VW Polo 1.6 TDI BlueMotion 90 3.7 64

Seat Ibiza 1.4 TDI Ecomotive 80 3.7 64

Ford Fiesta 1.6 TDCi ECOnetic 90 3.7 64

smart fortwo coupé 0.8 cdi pure softip 54 3.4 69